"People become wedded to their beliefs, because the validity
of those beliefs reflects on their competence, commends them as authorities,
and rationalizes their mandate to lead.
Challenge a person’s beliefs and you challenge his dignity, stand, and
power. And when those beliefs are based
on nothing but faith, they are chronically fragile. No one gets upset about the belief that rocks
fall down as opposed to up because all sane people can see it with their own
eyes. Not so for the belief that babies
are born with original sin or that god exists in three persons or that Ali was
the second-most divinely inspired man after Muhammad. When people organize their lives around these
beliefs and then learn of other people who seem to be doing just fine without
them – or worse, who credibly rebut them – they are in danger of looking like
fools. Since one cannot defend a belief
based on faith by persuading skeptics it is true, the faithful are apt to react
to unbelief with rage, and may try to eliminate that affront to everything that
makes their lives meaningful."
- Steven Pinker, The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why
Violence Has Declined
I absolutely used to feel like this when I was a
Christian. I can say, even to this day,
that when someone challenges my beliefs or doesn't come to the same conclusions
as I do that my initial inclination is to get angry (usually because I feel as
though I’m not making my point adequately).
The difference between then and now is the reaction AFTER that initial
pull towards anger.
When I was young, and felt like I needed to always defend my
faith over all else, I would see red. It
was god over everything else, no exceptions.
That is what a true soldier for god would do. No matter what the argument, no matter how
valid, no matter what the source, if it went against god’s will or the word of
the bible, it was wrong. However, I
lacked any real information of substance outside of my simple faith and the
words in an ancient book. So I got angry
and went on the offensive. It would
either detach from the conversation in rage, or I would try to end it with ad
hominem as quickly as I could because I didn't want to be associated with
someone who wasn't on fire for god.
Now, after my years of reflection, meditation, and critical
thought I have left that behind me. In
addition to leaving my faith, a side effect of that thought process has left me
in a much better state of discourse when talking about things like this. Instead of getting angry at them, I push that
feeling aside and instead replace it with a feeling of curiosity. Curiosity for why they think the way they
do. Then I compare how I got to my
conclusion with how they got to theirs.
This is how we grow and learn.
Yet now I see it from the other side of the fence. People now act this way towards me when I
challenge the beliefs I used to hold, that they STILL hold.
Comments
Post a Comment